I don’t know why people are still arguing about Obama’s birth certificate.
Here are some of the articles relating to this phony document:
http://tinyurl.com/6z3rxe6 Info wars
http://tinyurl.com/3h4ql2y Advises one to learn how clipping masks work.
http://tinyurl.com/3ppzt9h Fakery unrelated to computer manipulation
http://tinyurl.com/68htqk A more comprehensive approach
http://tinyurl.com/3dysqpa Some convincing expert testimony on YouTube
I’d give you more, but there are about 3,930,000 results for “Obama birth certificate fake.”
Here’s an article that asserts that the certificate is genuine: http://tinyurl.com/3ezzs6j. Another one, on YouTube, asserts the same thing: http://tinyurl.com/3f6o9u7. This appears to be the world’s lamest attempt at getting the video removed because some liberal can manipulate the data in a different way. I could be wrong, I guess. I was once in 1964 when I thought I’d made a mistake.
Naturally, Google places the first one claiming legitimacy as #1 among the three-million odd entries, few others of which seem to claim legitimacy for this taurine poo. Note, though, that whereas what this expert says is technically correct, it doesn’t answer the real questions plaguing this phony document. It tells us only that the document was scanned using some Adobe product. It doesn’t tell us anything about why typewritten information, for example, shows up as if the document were prepared on at least two different typewriters. It doesn’t tell us why the certificate number contains a character that could only have come from a computer. It doesn’t tell us why the pattern at the fold where the page was ostensibly copied from a book of bound birth certificates is undistorted, as it would be if this were really such a copy. Beyond the typography, it doesn’t explain why anyone would copy a document into an easily-alterable computer format unless one sought to alter it. It doesn’t remark on the Registrar’s name, which appears to be a childish rendering of “U. Kelele” (yes, dear friends, liberals think we’re that stupid). It doesn’t explain why a birth certificate issued a day after Obama’s should have a lower number than the one that purports to be his. Forgive me if I’ve left out your favorite discrepancy, but my fingers are getting tired.
Liberals long ago mastered this technique of telling you something true as if it had anything to do with some egregious lie. This forged document is pure flim-flam, and so are they, down to and including their fraudulent “President.”
Now, shall we discuss why Obama’s Connecticut (he has several) social security number once belonged to a 120-year-old dead guy?
